首页> 外文OA文献 >The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

机译:综合神经肌肉抑制技术对非特异性颈部疼痛受试者上斜方肌触发点的功效:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Currently, large levels of practice variability exist regarding the clinical deactivation of trigger points. Manual physical therapy has been identified as a potential means of resolving active trigger points; however, to date the ideal treatment approach has yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of two manual treatment regimens on individuals with upper trapezius trigger points. Sixty patients, 19–38 years of age with non-specific neck pain and upper trapezius trigger points, were randomized into one of two, 4 week physical therapy programs. One group received muscle energy techniques while the second group received an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) consisting of muscle energy techniques, ischemic compression, and strain–counterstrain (SCS). Outcomes including a visual analog pain scale (VAS), the neck disability index (NDI), and lateral cervical flexion range of motion (ROM) were collected at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Results revealed large pre–post-effect sizes within the INIT group (Cohen’s d  =  0.97, 0.94 and 0.97). Additionally, significantly greater improvements in pain and neck disability and lateral cervical flexion ROM were detected in favor of the INIT group (0.29–0.57, 0.57–1.12 and 0.29–0.57) at a 95% CI respectively. The findings of this study indicate the potential benefit of an integrated approach in deactivating upper trapezius trigger points. Further research should be performed to investigate the long-term benefits of the current treatment approach.
机译:当前,关于触发点的临床失活存在很大程度的实践差异。手动物理疗法已被认为是解决主动触发点的一种潜在手段。然而,迄今为止,理想的治疗方法尚未阐明。这项临床试验的目的是比较两种手动治疗方案对具有上斜方肌触发点的个体的影响。 60名年龄在19-38岁的非特异性颈部疼痛和上斜方肌触发点的患者被随机分为两个,四个星期的物理治疗计划之一。一组接受肌肉能量技术,而第二组接受综合神经肌肉抑制技术(INIT),该技术由肌肉能量技术,缺血性压迫和反应变(SCS)组成。在治疗开始后2周和4周收集包括视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS),颈部残疾指数(NDI)和颈椎侧屈运动范围(ROM)在内的结果。结果显示,INIT组内的前效应后大小较大(Cohen d = 0.97、0.94和0.97)。此外,在INIT组(95%CI)下,疼痛和颈部残疾以及颈椎侧屈ROM的改善明显更大(分别为0.29–0.57、0.57–1.12和0.29–0.57)。这项研究的结果表明,综合方法在停用上斜方肌触发点方面具有潜在的优势。应该进行进一步的研究以调查当前治疗方法的长期益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号